|
Post by taylov on Apr 28, 2017 21:58:04 GMT
I think its probably better that the former chairman owns the ground then the current one.... The difficulty comes because neither of them actually owns the ground. It is part of a separate company's pension scheme and as such remains an asset under UK pension law. According to the Orient forum, the pension trustees want to maximise the value of that asset by using more of the site for housing development. Difficult times ahead? The situation at Torquay seems to be just as bad, if not worse.
|
|
|
Post by tenacres on Apr 29, 2017 20:53:40 GMT
|
|