|
Post by back4more on Sept 27, 2016 18:03:13 GMT
Is anyone opening a book on the next England manager? I can only see one candidate.
|
|
|
Post by Bruce Forbes on Sept 27, 2016 18:34:39 GMT
Ronnie Moore?
|
|
|
Post by Bruce Forbes on Sept 27, 2016 18:57:30 GMT
Or Nigel Pearson!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2016 19:48:54 GMT
Who cares when we have gutter press journalists stitching a man up only 67 days in the job. Yes he made some poor comments but it was entrapment. Are they proud of themselves for destroying him? For what purpose did they do it? They give the press a bad name when behaviour like this ruins his life, it's unacceptable.
|
|
|
Post by tenacres on Sept 27, 2016 20:00:02 GMT
I wonder who you are thinking of back4more? Koeman?!
I think Pardew is the early favourite.
|
|
|
Post by back4more on Sept 27, 2016 21:11:16 GMT
I wonder who you are thinking of back4more? Koeman?! I think Pardew is the early favourite. I'm hoping I am wrong in my thinking Rendel so I won't mention the name I would go for. That's not Koeman though. They need to stick with the idea of an Englishman. I hope they do go for Alan Pardew or for Steve Bruce who has also been suggested to me by someone. Steve Bruce is their safe option I would suspect and would be compensation free, bearing in mind they have already spent the compensation budget. As for the journalists SoE, don't you think they have done us all a favour? If you are England manager you have to be above reproach.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2016 8:40:51 GMT
No John I don't think they have done us all a favour. I suspect most top managers are aware about third party options these days, clubs employ top legal experts to find ways round such things so they probably know how to 'bend' the FA law on it...Human Rights Act for example? My grouse is why did these two journalists set him up, it was a nasty thing to do and ended his career. Barely 10 weeks ago he told the world how proud he was to be England Manager and was his lifelong ambition achieved and they took it away from him.....for what purpose? It stinks that they lied to him about who they were, it stinks they recorded and filmed him unknowingly, they fired loaded questions at him after a few drinks, a set up from start to finish. I agree he should not have said anything about other people but if you load the question.....
I want to know why they did it, why did they target a new England Manager nine and a half weeks into his job, that's the part which does not make any sense at the moment to us, the general public. I don't much care about the England team, they let us down year after year after year, but what did Sam do to deserve such a nasty cheap low down set up. That man is now a broken one and those journalists are quite frankly s**ts and belong in the sewer with it.
|
|
|
Post by back4more on Sept 28, 2016 9:05:51 GMT
Keith, in the interview I saw Allardyce explaining how you can make millions with a couple of hours work.
That is millions being siphoned out of football into the pockets of parasites and pariahs.
Anyone who does that deserves utter contempt. Anyone who does that from a position of power and privilege in the game is beneath contempt.
That money should be going to grass roots football, to kids teams, to park teams, to training the coaches and referees we need, to building local stadia like you see in every small town in France for example.
More strength to any journalist who can catch a rat before it lines its nest.
If you still want to condemn the journalists and condone the actions of the ex England manager, please ask yourself who it is who is making the apologies and accepting his wrongdoing in public. Perhaps the only shred of decency being shown perhaps.
|
|